Adam Piggott wrote an article on his new Substack about the Indian concept of “izzat”. This is from a post on Kiwi Farms which has spread through X as that is where I first read about it. Rather than try to put the concept in my own words, I will just quote from the Kiwi Farms thread as it is a good summary:
Izzat conflicts are not about who is right and who is wrong. It’s about who wins and who loses. This means it’s a zero-sum game where just about any action is justified (including murder) to restore the lost Izzat. Izzat is a limited social currency and the easiest way to get it is to take it from someone else. Winning is righteous in Izzat. Losing is unrighteous. This means that if someone plays the game of izzat well enough, they can get away with just about anything (murder, rape, scamming, cheating, stealing). The only morality in Izzat is the protection of your group’s collective ego. The only appropriate response when your Izzat is attacked is the complete destruction of whoever insulted it.
The first thing that came to mind when reading this was the less defined concept of ‘keeping it real’ among American blacks which I was introduced to on Chappelle’s Show around twenty years ago. The latter might not be as intensely ingrained as ‘izzat’ but it is similarly destructive and certainly irrational to the Western mind.
Before seeing this, I was thinking of writing something about it myself and his article has prompted me to do so.
Jefferson Davis, American by William J. Cooper Jr., Knopf, November 1st, 2001





The Insider by Christopher Pyne, Hachette Australia, March 31st, 2021