I can be quite cheap with my spending in regard to certain things. The main example would be with regard to entertainment. If you wait a few years to see a movie, buy a game or read a book, the quality isn’t going to diminish in the same way that mayonnaise will. So I have no problem looking for the best deal I can on entertainment (short of piracy or bootlegs), because I know I will be getting the same thing and for a lot cheaper. The price on release is more a matter of recovering development/production costs and the quickly fading novelty of being new.
I am quite the opposite when it comes to more important matters. If my car needs new brakes or tyres for example, I am not going to go for the cheap option. Equally so with regards to buying footwear, dental treatment and most types of electrical appliances. The cost of being cheap with many of these products or services can indeed be very expensive. What inspired this post has to do with an important household item that caused a lot more trouble in breaking than it would have if it had been changed when the signs of its failure were evident but less destructive. I warned the relevant authorities of the risk of what would (and subsequently did), happen but my advice was not heeded.
My brief role as a suburban Cassandra is really only relevant to the wider implications of this which I will delve into briefly below. Continue reading →